Robin
Lake Park, Georgia USA
Posts: 1,079
Joined: January 2002
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,349
Posts56,545
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
#45131
Mon Sep 20, 2010 7:22 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,893 Likes: 49
Needs to get a Life
|
OP
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,893 Likes: 49 |
Hi
I am slowly working through the articles that Pilgrim posted called Old Earth vs. Young Earth.
In the article put forth by Modern Reformation, it says the following as a precursor to their article. "Modern Reformation as an organization does not take a view on the age of the earth other than to say that Genesis was not revealed in order to provide a scientific description of origins but as an historical prologue justifying God's lordship over all creation. The editors believe that this article is an important contribution to the "hallway" conversation (C.S. Lewis) that we are trying to facilitate in our pages. We realize that not every article we publish will appeal to every one of our subscribers, but we hope that you'll agree that Modern Reformation stimulates your thinking, challenging you to know what you believe and why you believe it."
While I definitely do not agree with the Old Age view, over the last few years I have run into a lot of Reformed Christians who do not believe in the 6/24 day view. These same Reformed Christians as far as I can tell are pretty consistent when it comes to other doctrine of the faith, but for what ever reason, when it comes to the age of the earth, that is where they become inconsistent.
I mention this mainly because if memory serves me correctly, the staff at Modern Reformation is not all in agreement when it comes to this particular issue. Hence, it would probably be the main reason why they do not take a view on the age of the earth as an organization.
I would like to comment on the first part of Modern Reformation’s comment.
"Modern Reformation as an organization does not take a view on the age of the earth other than to say that Genesis was not revealed in order to provide a scientific description of origins but as an historical prologue justifying God's lordship over all creation.”
I am not totally sure I agree with them about the scientific aspect of this quote. While Genesis might not go into a detailed scientific description of origins; can we honestly say that it does not give us a basic scientific description of origins?
Tom
Last edited by Tom; Mon Sep 20, 2010 7:30 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
167
guests, and
40
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|