Reading his response, it sounds like he's a premillennialist who's been influenced by Judaizers (especially considering his use of "Tanach" for Old Testament & "Jeshua" for Jesus). He's certainly not understanding the Book of Hebrews' meaning in terms of the change in the regulation of worship. The entire Mosaic economy, in that respect, has been set aside since the resurrection of Christ; it was all centered on the sacrificial system of Tabernacle/Temple worship. Passover in particular cannot be celebrated, according to the Law, without the sacrifice of a lamb.

I don't have a problem with, say, historical reconstructions of what these feasts may have looked like. But actually celebrating them is returning to an economy of worship that prefigures Christ, & by logical inference denies His Advent.


I tell you, this man went down to his house justified.