So Im part way through Zorn's article and he seems to be making sense, I have a bone wrt the woman caught in adultery.


)
Quote
. We concede that the Lord may have regarded the penal sanction as of valid application for Israel in the old economy of which he and the Pharisees were still a part, though evidently he did not insist on it for the woman taken in adultery who was brought to him


This looks to me as out of place on Zorn's part as are the examples he cites as misused by Bahnsen.

The woman was released because there were no witnesses willing to testify. Clearly a direct application of the law.

Anyways so far so good bravo

H