Thanks, Tom...

But I wasn't asking for advice on what I might be comfortable with, and I'm not so attached to paedobaptism that I'm unwilling to reexamine it.

What I'm asking for is for the Baptist brothers here to read this presentation and compare it with my "interpretation of it" here and then tell me if I have understood it correctly. That's all.

It is simply a view of covenant theology that is unfamiliar to me. I've never heard of it before, but apparently it has been around for centuries.

When you read my summary of the presentation you'll find that I have some very positive thoughts about it, and it seems to me that the Baptist position is less susceptible to the kind of interpretation that has led some Presbyterians towards the FV heresy. I also find it more consistent than the Presbyterian position with regard to the Lord's Supper.

Please have a look, just to tell me if I got it right.

Then I'll decide what is true. I don't really care if it's not comfortable. laugh