|
|
|
|
|
Posts: 3,464
Joined: September 2003
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,351
Posts56,547
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295
Yesterday at 09:40 PM
|
|
|
#54280
Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:42 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,904 Likes: 1
Permanent Resident
|
OP
Permanent Resident
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,904 Likes: 1 |
What is optimal equilvalence? I know the NIV used dynamic equivalence. So the question is what is the difference between the two? Here is an extract from the opening paragraph on the website. HOW THE CSB WAS TRANSLATED
The CSB was translated using a methodology called Optimal Equivalence, which balances contemporary English readability with linguistic precision to the original languages. In the many places throughout Scripture where a word-for-word rendering is clearly understandable, a literal translation is used. When a word-for-word rendering might obscure the meaning for a modern audience, a more dynamic translation is used.
John Chaney
"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." Colossians 2:7
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
152
guests, and
78
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
