The Highway Forums General Discussion Open Forum Free Speech

1. On what basis do you judge the motives of Rebel News owners, reporters, and/or others who work for that company?
2. And what "agenda" are you suggesting they are "serving"?
3. How is Rebel News probably serving this alleged agenda?
4. In one of your replies to Tom you complained that Rebel News and other conservative News agencies serve no real purpose other than to rile up the emotions of their listeners/readers. Is this actually wrong if reporting something stirs the emotions of someone? Is reporting the rescue of a family from a torrential flood and imminent death which stirs people in some way also wrong? People's responses are owned by the individuals themselves and not those who report the news. Secondly, where is it written that a news agency is responsible to DO something about what they find and then report? Their talent is in research, discovery and relaying the information to others. Must those who engage in this activity only qualify to do so IF they also have the ability to get personally involved to fix a problem, stop a criminal, prevent a catastrophe, feed all the poor, give medical care to those in need, etc. etc.??? Is it Rebel News or Newsmax therefore responsible to arrest, prosecute, judge and punish corrupt politicians? Please explain yourself so I can hopefully understand your angst and why it is directed at so many who may do their job(s) well!

Thanks