|

|
|
|
Robin
Lake Park, Georgia USA
Posts: 1,079
Joined: January 2002
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,349
Posts56,545
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295 Yesterday at 09:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,026 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,026 Likes: 274 |
BrimstonePreacha, I must admit that I have always had serious problems with the statement, made by both Rome, the Orthodox Church and some of the Reformers, that Mary was the "Mother of God". I am, however, more than privy to the differences each group held to that phrase. However, I still have a strong aversion to referring to Mary as the "Mother of God", for on the surface, one could easily understand it to mean that Mary "birthed" God, which is clearly a blasphemous and offensive statement, both to the Lord and to my intellect. I do think there are more appropriate ways to express Mary giving birth to the Lord Jesus Christ, Who was God incarnate.  So, I can certainly sympathize with your consternation and wanting to discuss this topic of Mary's virginity. But, isn't the issue really between Rome, who believes in Mary's perpetual virginity and the biblical teaching that she was only a virgin up to the birth of the Lord Christ? Rome has never denied Mary's virginity but has propagated the superstitious tradition that she remained a virgin after Christ's birth. As to the other matter which Paul_S admonished for, I have no comment.  In His Grace,
Last edited by Pilgrim; Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:10 AM.
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
94
guests, and
47
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|