Forum Search
Member Spotlight
Pilgrim
Pilgrim
NH, USA
Posts: 15,027
Joined: April 2001
Forum Statistics
Forums31
Topics8,351
Posts56,547
Members992
Most Online4,295
Yesterday at 09:40 PM
Top Posters
Pilgrim 15,027
Tom 4,893
chestnutmare 3,464
J_Edwards 2,615
John_C 1,904
Wes 1,856
RJ_ 1,583
MarieP 1,579
Robin 1,079
Top Posters(30 Days)
Pilgrim 35
Tom 4
Robin 1
Recent Posts
"The Lord will perfect that which concerneth me."
by Pilgrim - Sat May 23, 2026 6:06 AM
"He led them forth by the right way."
by Pilgrim - Fri May 22, 2026 5:35 AM
King of Kings
by Tom - Thu May 21, 2026 4:31 PM
"If so be ye have tasted that the Lord is gracious."
by Pilgrim - Thu May 21, 2026 5:30 AM
"Marvellous lovingkindness."
by Pilgrim - Wed May 20, 2026 9:09 AM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 187
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 187
Tom,
If you will read my post again, you will see that I did not accuse anyone of believing in Presumptive Regeneration. I was pointing out what I see as the chief danger in Paedo-baptism. I saw nothing in Joe's posts to me to tell me if he believed in PR or not. He started this thread by quoting from Matt McMahon who certainly believes in PR, but I did not accuse him of anything and I expect that in any case he is old enough to look after himself.

Blessings,
Steve


Itinerant Preacher & Bible Teacher in Merrie England.
1689er.
Blogging at
http://marprelate.wordpress.com
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,893
Likes: 49
Tom Offline
Needs to get a Life
Offline
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,893
Likes: 49
Steve

You might not have intentionally done so, but based on what you wrote I don't know how Joe or I could have concluded otherwise.
The only thing I really don't understand about Joe is why he continues use McMahon. There are a lot other people that support his position than McMahon.
The section that Joe quoted on McMahon however does not support 'Presumptive Regeneration'.

By now you should know that Joe does not support McMahon's 'Presumptive Regeneration'. He has stated that many times, so why bring it up?

I agree that Joe is old enough to defend himself, but my post was based on something I learned from James White.
James White was in Salt Lake City, witnessing to Mormons, when he noticed a lot of supposed Christians with signs with untruth and half truths about Mormons. He approached these sign carriers and told them they were misrepresenting Mormons and told them how they were doing so.
They basically called him a Mormon sympathizer and wrote him off.
Several Mormons had watched this exchange and came over to thank him for sticking up for them. James told them that he was a Christian and didn't agree with Mormons on their theology, but he didn't believe people should be misrepresented. As a result he gained the respect of those Mormon people.

Tom

Last edited by Tom; Sun May 15, 2005 7:50 PM.
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615
Needs to get a Life
Offline
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,615
Quote
The only thing I really don't understand about Joe is why he continues use McMahon. There are a lot other people that support his position than McMahon.
The section that Joe quoted on McMahon however does not support 'Presumptive Regeneration'.
Tom, thanks for your comments, however, I must inquire, what are you talking about above? averagefellar, not myself began "this thread" with a quote from McMahon <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/scratch1.gif" alt="" /> or are you speaking of <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/shrug.gif" alt="" />


Reformed and Always Reforming,
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,893
Likes: 49
Tom Offline
Needs to get a Life
Offline
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,893
Likes: 49
Joe
My mistake <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/blush.gif" alt="" />. I was responding to Steve's comment saying that you started this thread by quoting McMahon. I didn't think of questioning his comments on that matter.
With that out of the way, I believe my other comments carry even more weight.

Tom

#23410 Sat Feb 04, 2006 10:16 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 710
Addict
Offline
Addict
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 710
A audio sermon by Fred Malone "The Hermeneutics of Baptist Covenant Theology"

Brief Sermon Overview:
Various Texts. What is the biblical approach to developing one's theology? Why is it that we are not Presbyterians? Dr. Malone explains how we come to and develop Reformed Baptist Covenant Theology.

SermonAudio.com

Just thought someone might like to hear this. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/excitedgrn.gif" alt="" />

Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 103 guests, and 33 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Bosco, Mike, Puritan Steve, NSH123, Church44
992 Registered Users
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
May
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Today's Birthdays
Tracylight
Popular Topics(Views)
1,879,739 Gospel truth