Donations for the month of February

We have received a total of "$0" in donations towards our goal of $175.

Don't want to use PayPal? Go HERE

Forum Search
Member Spotlight
Posts: 14,355
Joined: April 2001
Forum Statistics
Most Online732
Jan 15th, 2023
Top Posters
Pilgrim 14,355
Tom 4,405
chestnutmare 3,263
J_Edwards 2,615
Wes 1,856
John_C 1,854
RJ_ 1,583
MarieP 1,579
gotribe 1,060
Top Posters(30 Days)
Tom 13
Recent Posts
Scott Hahn Conversion
by Tom - Wed Feb 08, 2023 4:06 AM
“The Law of the Spirit of Life”
by NetChaplain - Wed Feb 01, 2023 10:12 AM
The Doctrine of the Atonement - Gresham Machen
by Pilgrim - Wed Feb 01, 2023 6:45 AM
False Accusation of Anti-Semiticism
by Pilgrim - Tue Jan 31, 2023 6:21 PM
Left Wing News trying to Blackmail RW News
by Tom - Fri Jan 27, 2023 10:27 PM
by NetChaplain - Fri Jan 27, 2023 3:29 PM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,356
Likes: 52
Head Honcho
Online Content
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,356
Likes: 52
Originally Posted by hisalone
Bridge's way of putting it is almost as though to imply we are "equal" with Christ, at least that is how I read it.
Methinks you are misreading Bridges. In the forensic (legal) sense, we ARE "equal with Christ"... the believer is declared to be righteous and ever shall be righteous on the basis of Christ's imputed righteousness. Since Christ's righteousness is 'covering' the believer, he is therefore "equal with Christ" in that sense. This is the doctrine of justification.

And those who have been truly justified will infallibly go on in sanctification whereby they are made holy and are partakers of Christ's divine nature, albeit in part in this life. In sanctification our disposition towards holiness is increased, having been changed in regeneration, which thus produces the good works which in themselves are decidedly imperfect yet accepted by our Father as we are united in Christ.


This unique doctrine in a special way
distinguishes the church from all other
nations and religions....[Justification] is the
pinnacle and chief bulwark of all teaching
and of the Christian religion itself; if this is
obscured, adulterated, or subverted, it is
impossible to retain purity of doctrine in
other loci. On the other hand, if this locus
is securely retained, all idolatrous ravings,
superstitions and other corruptions are
thereby destroyed (Loci Theologici II, p. 443)

In His grace,

[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
Pilgrim #41968 Tue Mar 17, 2009 12:43 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,060
gotribe Offline OP
Old Hand
OP Offline
Old Hand
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,060
Thanks, everyone, for all the input and the clarification. I knew that if I brought my 'confusion' and my question here, it'd be a safe place to get "sorted out."

I think it may have been MarieP who pointed out that my confusion was between justification and sanctification. I was hanging up on the idea that it is as if I always obeyed and missed factoring in the forensic aspect of justification. It's good to be straightened out when you need it!


Trust the past to God's mercy, the present to God's love and the future to God's providence." - St. Augustine
gotribe #42034 Sat Mar 21, 2009 10:33 AM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 418
Old Hand
Old Hand
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 418

I thought you might be pleased to hear that the specific content of your thread came up in my presence 2 nights ago. I had mentioned in another thread -- Request for help with Doctrinal Debate -- that I would be going over the basics of Justification by Faith Alone with the men who will be arguing the affirmative. Bearing in mind that these are going to be very primitive, short debates, and that the men are not only fairly recent believers but that almost all of them go to different churches, the main goal has been to get the men themselves to drink deeply from Romans 3-5, Galatians 2-3, Philippians 3, as well as finding other supporting passages--and I must say I have been blessed with the intensity with which they have pursued their study.

Thursday night I was offering counterarguments to get them to sharpen their responses, and again was pleased that, while they are not ready to take over for James White, they are quite appreciative of the doctrine of the double imputation and seem quite ready to defend it -- against our poor covenant teens, who have to try to argue the negative!

After our work session one of the men asked, "what would you say to someone who says "Justification means just-as-if-I'd never sinned"?". I silently gave thanks for your putting this thread up and immediatly gave the Bridges riposte--which I had not heard before this thread. Of course I then filled in the holes and explained, that both aspects were essential, but one is heavily under-emphasized these days; but I will admit it was nice to have the quick rejoinder as a segue to the more in-depth explanation.

In Christ,
Paul S
Paul_S #42043 Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:24 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,060
gotribe Offline OP
Old Hand
OP Offline
Old Hand
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,060
Glad it was beneficial!

Trust the past to God's mercy, the present to God's love and the future to God's providence." - St. Augustine
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 97 guests, and 25 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
PaulWatkins, His Unworthy Son, Nahum, TheSojourner, Larry
974 Registered Users
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Popular Topics(Views)
1,424,749 Gospel truth