|

|
|
|
Posts: 1,906
Joined: September 2001
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,381
Posts56,581
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295 May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
#16046
Thu Jul 08, 2004 1:42 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 30
Newbie
|
Newbie
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 30 |
averagefellar said: I assure you that how we view the atonement is quite essential. So essential that the reformers paid a significant price to expose the errors of Rome concerning it. How we view Christ and Gods purpose is incredibly important. While it does indeed divide, we need to work on understanding the Bible concerning this, to bring us back into unity. If you are saying it's important, then you are underscoring what I have said. If you are saying that one's belief on the subject of predestination will effect their eternal destiny, then you have distorted or misunderstood the gospel message ( http://gospel.jcsm.org) and you are incorrect. Thank you for starting the new thread. Right now, I will only address alleged Bible errors and will remain in the original thread. I'm sure others will join you, though. God bless, Jason _________________ Jesus Christ Saves Ministries http://www.jcsm.orgOver 60,000+ web pages! 500+ Israel pictures, Bible lessons, weekly devotions, lots of MP3 files, free email accounts, and much more.
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Atonement non-essential?
|
Anonymous
|
Thu Jul 08, 2004 5:18 AM
|
Re: Atonement non-essential?
|
Jason Gastrich
|
Thu Jul 08, 2004 5:42 AM
|
Re: Atonement non-essential?
|
fredman
|
Thu Jul 08, 2004 1:08 PM
|
Re: Atonement non-essential?
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu Jul 08, 2004 2:19 PM
|
Re: Atonement non-essential?
|
Jason Gastrich
|
Thu Jul 08, 2004 8:09 PM
|
Re: Atonement non-essential?
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu Jul 08, 2004 10:34 PM
|
Re: Atonement non-essential?
|
J_Edwards
|
Thu Jul 08, 2004 2:24 PM
|
Re: Atonement non-essential?
|
Reformation Monk
|
Thu Jul 08, 2004 8:01 PM
|
Re: Atonement non-essential?
|
Jason Gastrich
|
Thu Jul 08, 2004 8:07 PM
|
Jason's Slight of Hand
|
J_Edwards
|
Thu Jul 08, 2004 8:32 PM
|
Re: Atonement non-essential?
|
Jason Gastrich
|
Thu Jul 08, 2004 5:09 PM
|
Re: Atonement non-essential?
|
Anonymous
|
Thu Jul 08, 2004 6:22 PM
|
Re: Atonement non-essential?
|
Jason Gastrich
|
Thu Jul 08, 2004 7:06 PM
|
Re: Atonement non-essential?
|
fredman
|
Thu Jul 08, 2004 7:35 PM
|
Re: Atonement non-essential?
|
Jason Gastrich
|
Thu Jul 08, 2004 8:04 PM
|
Re: Atonement non-essential?
|
J_Edwards
|
Thu Jul 08, 2004 8:44 PM
|
Re: Atonement non-essential?
|
J_Edwards
|
Thu Jul 08, 2004 7:37 PM
|
Re: Atonement non-essential?
|
Anonymous
|
Thu Jul 08, 2004 6:03 PM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
71
guests, and
5
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|