Puritan said: In the very next versus we read that one of the disciples cuts off a mans ear with his sword. Then Jesus makes mention of swords and clubs in the context of weapons.
I do not believe I'm taking the text out of context. <snip> ... Dave.
I agree with the 'purpose' of a sword in general terms. But Jesus rebuked Peter for using his sword in that manner in the text you mention. Some think this was related to the cross (placing this rebuke in a similar theological context as Jesus' rebuke of Peter in Matt 16:23) and others see this as in line with Jesus' teaching on loving enemies (rather than hacking off their body parts) -- I think both interpretations are possible from the text. My point about the swords is that since Jesus disallowed Peter using it as an instrument of violence against his attackers, perhaps his reason for having two swords with the group was for something else. It seems possible from the context.
I too am at the beginning of my sanctification and I'm certainly not saying I would not act as Peter did and come out swinging -- I just have a hard time seeing Jesus doing that and as such, I have to pause and wonder if prayer, stealth, and seclusion are not better options for the Christian. I see it as an equally 'active' and protective response for my family -- just in the direction of non-violence.
Also, I don't think actively seeking protective cover and escape, and praying to the Maker of heaven and earth are 'passive' responses -- they just aren't violent. I certainly would place myself between an attacker and my family, particularly if they could escape while I did that but if I can usher my family out to safety -- all the better. One thing we agree on completely (besides the preciousness of family) is that this is a hard topic.
