John,

Are you asking for feedback as to whether others think "Faith Promises" are biblical?

From what I have read of this new 'rage' in Evanjellical Land, which is not much, it is not biblically sound.

I'm curious, however, if you believe Faith Promises is not biblical, why would you then say it could be used to fund missionaries, who are an extension of the Church? To me, it seems inconsistent, even hypocritical and pragmatic. I'm wondering how you would justify using something unbiblical for anything? [Linked Image]



[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]