If you've not figured it out by now, I have no shortage of articles for you all to peruse and discuss, should you like.
Here's one that's a bit strange: "Life After Calvinism." A number of the affirmations and denials seem well enough; but try this one on for size:
A Post-Calvinist affirms that baptism saves (regenerates?) in a real, true, and meaningful way. A Post-Calvinist denies that this threatens God’s eternal decrees.
<
Huh?
Anyway, have a look-see.
Kyle
I tell you, this man went down to his house justified.
It sounds as if this Post-Calvinist was never a Calvinist in the first place, but a Confusionist--that is, very confused about Scripture and doctrine. [img]http://www.the-highway.com/w3timages/icons/evilgrin.gif" alt="evilgrin" title="evilgrin[/img]
Kyle,<br><br>It sounds as if your Post Calvinist is actually a Post Modernist and never was a Cavinist at all.<br><br><br>Wes [img]http://www.the-highway.com/w3timages/icons/grin.gif" alt="grin" title="grin[/img]
When I survey the wondrous cross on which the Prince of Glory died, my richest gain I count but loss and pour contempt on all my pride. - Isaac Watts
Actually after reading the article and the meandering statements made in it I would not hesitate to say this is another example of the Doug Wilson school of theology. (take a look at some of the audio links on the page). As Mr. Wilson slowly takes many of the unwitting toward Rome (or his version of Rome) I'm sure that you will see more of this claptrap abounding. Myself I'd loose this link and get some better reading.
I haven't heard much on Doug Wilson. But the website as a whole generally has fairly good, thought-provoking, short articles. [img]http://www.the-highway.com/w3timages/icons/shrug.gif" alt="shrug" title="shrug[/img] I do try to read carefully, though.
Kyle
I tell you, this man went down to his house justified.
What's up with this? [img]http://www.the-highway.com/w3timages/icons/confused.gif" alt="confused" title="confused[/img]<blockquote>A Post-Calvinist affirms that the Lord’s Supper is truly administered in Presbyterian and Reformed churches. A Post-Calvinist denies that cracker crumbs and thimbles of grape juice are even close to obeying the regulative principle of worship.</blockquote>First, what does being Presbyterian or Reformed have to do with grape juice and the regulative principle? Second, aren't there Christian pastors who have been rightly set apart to administer the Lord's Supper in non-reformed and non-Presbyterian churches?<br><br>
