Stuart DiNenno said: I'm not interested in reading old threads or articles. I came here for discussion.
Quote
Pilgrim said: And perhaps you find some titillation in having discussions out of ignorance rather than being informed of the subject you desire to discuss? The thread I referenced for you contains some very interesting and salient discussions on the subject in question. Further, the 3-part article I offered to you is truly a classic and one which you would doubtless benefit from, i.e., if you consider gaining knowledge of a subject to be beneficial? <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/shrug.gif" alt="" />
I don't know that anything to which you referred me is really informative. Maybe your opinion of the documents which you referenced is correct and they are useful, but I'm not willing to take the time to find out. And I would not refer you to articles on my website and insinuate that you choose to remain ignorant if you don't go there and read them, so please don't do that to me. If you would like to refer me to other places where I can find information which you believe to be helpful, then please do so. But don't act as though I am neglecting a responsibility if I choose not to look at your referenced documents.
Quote
Pilgrim said: Lastly, I agree with Ruth, that your remark was quite rude and one that will be reserved for further discussion. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />
Maybe I could have prefaced my remark by thanking you for the referrals. But what I said is true. I am not interested in reading old threads or articles. I came here for discussion.
