I notice how you like to make judgements of people you don't even know. Where did you ever get the idea that I want to remain undogmatic about anything?
Tom, your own words and actions here are how I know you. I've moderated here for some time now and been around longer. Aren't your words representative of your true character? I think in this time I could say I understand your beliefs and posts fairly well.
You prefer to remain non-dogmatic about several issues. Isn't that what you claimed you were concerning an age of accountability? What about that conversation about the gifts? Still non-dogmatic about tongues?
I am dogmatic about baptism as well. I don't need to read Malone's book. I've read scripture and the credo position holds no merit. What I want to discuss is why an
age of accountability is very much in line with baptist theology......care to actually interact with my question?
I mentioned Malone's book not because I want to discuss the matter, but because I thought it might help you know where I am coming from better.
What better way to know you better than to discuss the issue? Fred's not infallible. I
used to be a baptist. I attended the religious studies program at an arminian-credo school for two years. I understand the position. I was just attempting to bring you back to orthodoxy instead of being dogmatic about the one issue that makes you part of a schism.
If any baptists here wish to put up some of Malone's errors, I'm sure myself or others would address these issues.
God bless,
william
