|

|
|
|
Posts: 146
Joined: August 2021
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,349
Posts56,545
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,893 Likes: 49
Needs to get a Life
|
OP
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,893 Likes: 49 |
Wes
As I said to Pilgrim in my last post, they usually say that those were not prophesies.
I thought I would tell you something else that I think is a huge blow to the foundation of the Watch Tower Society. I am not sure you are aware of the importance that pyramids played in the early years of the Watch Tower Society.
(Details are from memory of conversations about 10 years ago) I had a friend who for a time was a JW, he told me about the time he and an elder JW went to the house of a Christian. During the discussion the Christian brought up the fact that even their founder Charles Tess Russell was buried under a pyramid shaped head stone. The elder JW said that was a big lie. Fortunately my friend's desire for the truth was stronger than the word of the elder JW (to question an elder could mean excommunication). He decided that he was going to check things out for himself and go to the grave site of Charles Tess Russell himself. When he did he found out that what the Christian said was true after all. Further research also showed him that it wasn’t until the late 1920s (not sure of that date) that the Watch Tower Society distanced themselves from teachings on pyramids. However, my friend was not fooled by this because if the teaching of their founder could not be trusted, then obviously their whole system is on a shaky foundation. At that point, my friend quit being a JW even before he was excommunicated.
I wish I could tell you more about the specific meaning that the Watch Tower Society placed on pyramids in their early years, but I can’t.
On the subject of questioning an elder, to a JW there is a fear that holds them strongly to the organization. Although questions are encouraged, if the answer does not satisfy the JW who asked the question, they know that to question the word of the organization can result in serious consequences. These consequences could include, minor discipline or excommunication. To the JW who has family and friends in the organization, the family is to treat the offending person as apostate, which is a very demoralizing thing to happen to anyone. Needless to say, when we are witnessing to a JW we should keep that in mind and pray for the person.
Tom
Last edited by Tom; Fri Oct 07, 2005 1:21 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
Tom
|
Fri Sep 16, 2005 3:56 PM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri Sep 16, 2005 4:34 PM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
Tom
|
Fri Sep 16, 2005 9:38 PM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
William
|
Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:42 PM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
Tom
|
Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:37 AM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
Wes
|
Mon Sep 19, 2005 1:25 AM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
Tom
|
Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:58 PM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:26 PM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
Tom
|
Mon Sep 19, 2005 9:43 PM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:07 PM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
Tom
|
Tue Sep 20, 2005 7:44 AM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu Sep 22, 2005 9:33 PM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
Tom
|
Fri Sep 23, 2005 7:01 AM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
Pilgrim
|
Fri Sep 23, 2005 11:40 AM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
Tom
|
Fri Sep 23, 2005 5:04 PM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1 - EDITED
|
beloved57
|
Sat Jun 17, 2006 6:50 AM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
Wes
|
Sat Sep 17, 2005 1:39 AM
|
I am Happy to Report
|
Tom
|
Thu Sep 22, 2005 8:30 PM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
William
|
Sat Sep 24, 2005 4:38 PM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
Tom
|
Sat Sep 24, 2005 10:34 PM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
DavidAReed
|
Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:05 PM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
Wes
|
Wed Sep 28, 2005 11:30 PM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
Pilgrim
|
Thu Sep 29, 2005 5:09 AM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
Wes
|
Thu Sep 29, 2005 5:07 PM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
Tom
|
Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:04 AM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
DavidAReed
|
Thu Sep 29, 2005 5:10 PM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
Tom
|
Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:24 AM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
William
|
Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:11 PM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
DavidAReed
|
Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:49 PM
|
Re: The Trinity - Essential Doctrine # 1
|
William
|
Fri Sep 30, 2005 12:39 AM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
117
guests, and
33
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|