speratus said: No, I don't think you mean to do that. You have an inconsistant Christology, a Christ with a dual personality. The human nature and the divine nature of Christ have one personality, Impeccability, or else there would be two persons. The divine nature appropriating to itself human mortality does not split the personality of the person.
So you think the Council of Chalcedon (451 A.D) was wrong when it wrote: http://reformed.org/documents/index.html?mainframe=chalcedon.html one and the same Christ, Son, Lord, Only-begotten, recognized in two natures, without confusion, without change, without division, without separation; the distinction of natures being in no way annulled by the union, but rather the characteristics of each nature being preserved and coming together to form one person and subsistence, not as parted or separated into two persons, but one and the same Son and Only-begotten God the Word, Lord Jesus Christ;
From the Westminster Confession: http://www.gpcredding.org/wcf.html#C8 So that two whole, perfect, and distinct natures, the Godhead and the manhood, were inseparably joined together in one person, without conversion, composition, or confusion. Which person is true God, and true man, yet one Christ, the only Mediator between God and man.
Were they wrong to say the Divine and human natures did not combine?
