Thanks for the reply Jeff. There are those today who prefer to use a means less democratic because they believe it becomes a popularity contest. They contend that the same men get re-elected quite frequently. I'm not sure if that is just sour grapes coming from those who never seem to get elected or if it’s a legitimate argument. Some men want to serve in the offices of the church and have been nominated a number of times and yet never elected. Thus it’s been said that the method of voting is flawed and becomes a popularity contest.

I haven't done much of a research on this topic. However, I did notice that one of the older confessions of the church the Belgic Confession uses the term election in Article 31.

The Officers of the Church

"We believe that ministers of the Word of God, elders, and deacons ought to be chosen to their offices by a legitimate election of the church, with prayer in the name of the Lord, and in good order, as the Word of God teaches."

In addition I found an article in my church's manuel for church government that references the purpose and function of congregational meetings.

Quote
Article 37

The council, besides seeking the cooperation of the congregation in the
election of officebearers, shall also invite its judgment about other major
matters, except those which pertain to the supervision and discipline of
the congregation. For this purpose the council shall call a meeting at least
annually of all members entitled to vote. Such a meeting shall be conducted
by the council, and only those matters which it presents shall be considered.
Although full consideration shall be given to the judgment expressed by
the congregation, the authority for making and carrying out final decisions
remains with the council as the governing body of the church.

Maybe that's enough said. Any additional thoughts would be appreciated.

Wes

When I survey the wondrous cross on which the Prince of Glory died, my richest gain I count but loss and pour contempt on all my pride. - Isaac Watts