The Highway Forums General Discussion Open Forum Applied Apologetics

Here's something a little different. I would like any who consider themselves versed in the various apolegetics schools (presuppositionalist, evidentialist, etc.) to read a particular, current article from the New York Times and offer an outline of a response in terms of one of the apologetics disciplines. Please assume you are speaking to the author of the article, and simply outline what you would convey as a presuppositionalist, etc. Please indicate at the outset which approach you are using, and if you use an approach with which you disagree, please be reasonably fair in your presentation! I am hoping to demonstrate in a real-life context the differences between the approaches, so if you care to comment about why you feel one approach is better than another in the context of this article, please do so!

Here's the article: Believe It, or Not.

Thanks in advance!