I'm thinking of the more prominent questionable things and even heretical things:
His view on justification in Future Grace
His non-cessationism
His view of ordaining women deacons
His teaching called "Christian Hedonism" (which by the way Edwards NEVER believed nor wrote)
His involvement with the "Acts 29" Group, albeit a more recent item
I am not certain I understand "Future Grace", care to link me so I can check it out.
As for the others, yes I would say not being a cessationist is an error, and depending on how deep you go it may be an error that disqualifies my fellowship with you. However, I don't think Piper is all Dog howling and swinging from chandeliers.
Ordaining Women as Deacons, it may be an error. I just don't see the scripture barring them, but I don't see it affirming them either. However, I will continue to uphold the Doctrinal Standards of the PCA which means I will not support women being ordained as Deacons.
I have read the book, "Desiring God", and while I do think he seems to have just ran with it and gone too far, there are however truths within that book that are often ignored by the bulk of Christendom, making God properly the object of our Joy, Worship, Faith and Praise.
Though I have had no real dealings with the Acts 29 movement, a quick skimming of their Doctrines page does not reveal anything that is a Red Flag, though I did just skim it, so I could be wrong. What is the exact error or heresy that makes this group suspect?
