Originally Posted by Tom
What you might call "maturity" when it comes to John Piper; I don't look at in that manner. Though I would say that I try to look at the evidence when I read something and that has nothing to do with who said it.
Whether it is you, Edwards, John Piper, RC Sproul etc... I believe it is my responsibility to be like a Berean and examine the Scriptures to see if what they say is true. The key being that the Scriptures are the only infallible source of truth.
1. If maturing in the faith isn't growing in discernment, putting off the old and putting on the new, then please tell me what Christian "maturity" is!

2. Re: "...it has nothing to do with who said it." Well, Tom, I hope this is another instance of you not phrasing your thoughts as you ought. shrug But you had BETTER take into account who said what. In this particular case, Piper makes claim that his "Christian Hedonism" was at least partly due to Jonathan Edwards, i.e., things Edwards wrote. Thus, searching the Scriptures will avail nothing. You have to consult the alleged source. Piper also claims that this view is mentioned in the Westminster Shorter Catechism. But when one reads the original phrase, it says nothing about Christian Hedonism.

Originally Posted by Tom
One of the things I have found in reading people who critique Piper’s form of Christian Hedonism. Is that in a few cases they can’t get past the word “hedonism”. They look at this word and they automatically think of it in the negative sense; rather than in the way Piper means the word. As a result what they are critiquing isn’t an accurate depiction of what Piper teaches. At least, if I understand the issue properly.
Piper acknowledges that hedonism focused on oneself without the glory of God the ultimate object, is sinful.
1. And those who can't get past the word "hedonism" as being of negative connotation just might have a point. wink Look up the word in any reputable dictionary and they have a good reason to reject the word as Piper has used it, i.e., to mate it to "Christian". It's another one of those instances where something of this world; sin is "baptized" and brought into the church. There is no such thing as Christian murder, a Christian meth lab, a Christian brothel nor a Christian hedonist. What you wrote below shows that even you know in your heart that this is totally unbiblical and antithetical to Christ's teaching concerning "self", e.g., Matt 16:24; Mk 8:34; Lk 9:23 (interesting how the Holy Spirit thought it good to record this statement of the Lord Christ not once, not twice but three times). And, the Lord Christ summarized the moral law as FIRST loving God with all your heart, mind, soul and strength. And secondly, to love your neighbor as yourself. It is clear that the assumption is that all men already love themselves more than anything else, which is sin. The 'you must first learn to love yourself' error has been around for ages in myriad forms. The popular form in our day is building up your "self esteem". It's all the Devil's lie and psycho mumbo-jumbo.

2. And a regenerate man is given to see in small part what God sees within himself. The result of that is a painful experience called conviction of sin and a consequent turning FROM SELF to Christ. For as the apostle Paul confessed, "For I know that in me, that is, in my flesh, dwelleth no good thing:" (Rom 7:18). So, pray tell, what is there to love about yourself IF one, like Paul, has come to see that they are the "chief of sinners" (1Tim 1:15)?

Originally Posted by Tom
Yet, he believes that when we as Christians truly love ourselves, we seek to glorify God in everything we do; and the direction of how to do this is by getting to know Scripture.
I believe Piper puts the cart before the horse here, in that I think our focus should be on God as directed by Scripture and if we get joy from this, it is something that is a fruit of it.
Loving God should come first, not loving ourselves. Piper however, doesn’t believe that it is possible to not to love ourselves first and he also believes that this isn’t necessarily wrong, when its goal is to glorify God.
And don't you think that this in and of itself is a serious contradiction of Scripture, which is your sole and final authority in all matters of faith (doctrine) and life? Too many are given to downplay the seriousness of his Christian Hedonism. It isn't just a matter of a poor choice of words and trying to justify its use through clever sophistry, which Tim Keller also was guilty of with his book, The Prodigal God. rolleyes2

Lastly, God is most glorified in the display of His 'self'; His person and nature which was most splendidly displayed in the incarnation of the Son of God (Jh 1:14; Heb 1:3; 2Pet 1:17; 1Jh 1:1,2; 1Cor 1:31).


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]