I agree that there is but ONE meaning to any given text in Scripture. I firmly reject any and all views to the contrary, e.g., John Frame's "Multi-Perspectivalism".

However, there may be more than one application that can be derived from a passage. It would be most helpful if you could provide an example of what you consider to be an abuse of making many applications from a text.

I believe we are not far off in our views. grin


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]