I did read the article and that is why I decided to respond to you and ask YOU to clarify what exactly your point is. Historically, based upon Scripture, the Reformers, the Puritans and even now even using the term "Reformed" broadly, it has been affirmed that in Scripture the law of God is to be understood as being Civil, Ceremonial and Moral. Further, the use of the law is likewise to be understood as being Pedagogical, Civil and Moral/Normative.

For the sake of brevity, I referred you to The Highway website and the section where there are a number of salient articles which set forth this understanding of the law of God as it was given in Scripture and its three uses.

So again, if you could be so kind as to give me/us a brief summary of what you are trying to convey and how, if it does in fact differ from the Church's official doctrine, how it differs. Once that is established, I could better dialogue with you on this matter. grin


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]