Originally Posted by Pilgrim
Those who refuse to use actual wine do so mainly because in their view:

1. To drink any alcohol is a sin. (biblically indefensible).
2. They do not want to entice an ex-alcoholic to revert to drunkenness.

This second reason is likewise indefensible, particularly if it is done in regard to Christian Liberty, i.e., abstinence for the sake of the weaker brother. However, Scripture is crystal clear that the Church is ALWAYS to practice and/or legislate policy as the stronger brother, for the scruples of the weaker brother find fault with things which are in and of themselves good, i.e., sanctioned by God Himself. If the Scriptures teach that wine is to be used in the Lord's Supper, then wine should be used. Jesus did not turn water into grape juice. wink

Pilgrim, I agree with you. I particularly liked what you said about the Church practicing or legislating for the stronger if sanctioned by God Himself, I'd not heard that angle. I had a 'wicked' thought since posting. I see myself in the near future now: "Pastor, since we believe in the two Scriptural ordinances as Baptists, and we insist on baptism being done according to Scripture, immersion as to symbolize the burial and then rising up to new life; why are we not so particular to handle the Lord's Supper with the same exactness, using red wine?" My Pastor has a good sense of humor, an older man so I think he'd take it in good spirit. laugh

Ned