I know.
Mr. Leung's views are well outside the bounds of Reformed, Biblical Christianity. I wouldn't expect anyone I've interacted with here to have much common ground with them.
I was just curious to try and find out where he was coming from.
But now that I have, ironically, I find myself even more firmly convinced of several of the historical doctrines that he directly attacks:
* The sufficiency of the Biblical canon (meaning it cannot be added to, whether by "direct personal revelation" or any other means)
* The need for written, shared confessions and creeds. Mr. Leung demonstrates what can happen when people decide to ignore them. His novel readings of Scripture, some of them unique to himself, seem willfully dismissive of the history of the Church and how God's saints in the past applied Scripture to similar questions.
* The Holiness of God, which would seem to preclude His being the direct Author of Sin, without in any way compromising His Sovereignty. (Not to mention His Goodness, His Justice, His Righteousness, or His Love.)
