Originally Posted by Pilgrim
David Engelsma has an excellent presentation where he uses Matthew 24 which you can read here: A Defense of (Reformed) Amillennialism.

Engelsma does a good job on explaining the wrongs of those in the reconstruction movement in their views of postmillennial, partial preterist, etc; but it seems to me that some are using partial preterism today in ways to advocate postmillennialism, John's writings before 70 AD, the super importance of 70 AD among others. Many like myself would agree that some of Matthew 24 has been fulfilled, but not most. Now, their could be advanced that there is a double fulfillment, but not that most has been fulfilled.

Is there a definitive definition of partial preterist? I tend to think it is not stationary in how it is being used.

John Chaney

"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." Colossians 2:7