………. “ The logic of eugenics goes as follows: All species, including humans, have adapted and improved from a lower to a higher form. It should be obvious that certain human traits (good health, intelligence, moral behavior) are superior to others. Therefore, it is incumbent upon society to make sure humans with certain traits do not reproduce.
By 1920, at least 30 states had laws that required the sterilization of people who were determined as unfit, including “criminals, idiots, imbeciles and rapists,” as many state laws were worded. About 60,000 people were sterilized because of these laws. Many states refused to issue marriage licenses to couples who did not have a certificate from a physician stating that neither person had undesirable qualities in their bloodline.
John Scopes admitted to having taught lessons out of George William Hunter’s textbook A Civic Biology. If you’ve never read this book, it might shock you.
Hunter divided mankind into five races, concluding the highest race was “the Caucasians, represented by the civilized white inhabitants of Europe and America.”
In a different section of the book, he discussed what should be done to people with inferior traits:
“If such people were lower animals, we would probably kill them off to prevent them from spreading. Humanity will not allow this, but we do have the remedy of separating the sexes in asylums or other places and in various ways preventing intermarriage and the possibilities of perpetuating such a low and degenerate race.”
William Jennings Bryan, one of the attorneys representing the state in the Scopes Monkey Trial, wrote a long closing argument that summarized his objections to evolution and its implications. Since defense attorney Clarence Darrow waived his right to make a closing statement, Bryan was not allowed to deliver his, but you can read Bryan’s argument on the internet.
Although Bryan didn’t use the word “eugenics,” he does allude to it in sections that describe the “cruel” and “bloody” impact that evolution was already having on American culture. “Science is a magnificent material force,” he wrote, “but it is not a teacher of morals. It can perfect machinery, but it adds no moral restraints to protect society from the misuse of the machine.”
And when did evolution become permanently separated from eugenics? After World War II.
When Nazi war criminals were being tried at Nuremberg, their defense attorneys claimed the idea of the Holocaust came from eugenics theory and practice, quoting a 1927 U.S. Supreme Court decision in favor of state-mandated sterilization of the “unfit.”
Because of this and other reasons, eugenics fell out of favor in the U.S.
Science textbooks still teach evolution, but they no longer use the theory to defend eugenics.”
The forgotten link between Scopes Monkey Trial, eugenics…..
https://www.mainstreet-nashville.co...4a0306e-016d-11ed-b865-7f56514afc2f.html