|

|
|
|
Tom
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 4,893
Joined: April 2001
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,356
Posts56,552
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295 May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,030 Likes: 276
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,030 Likes: 276 |
In reply to: [color:"blue"]Exodus 21:16 is condemning the act of man stealing, or kidnapping another against his will and selling such a person into slavery. But that is a command against the kidnapper and his actions, not against slavery directly.
Fred,
I'm a bit [img]http://www.the-highway.com/w3timages/icons/confused.gif" alt="confused" title="confused[/img] by your statement above! Using your reasoning and applying it to prostitution, would we have to conclude that prostitutes are condemned but prostitution is not? Strange as it may seem, that is similar to a law here in , only in reverse. Here, prostitution; solicitation of "sexual favors" is illegal, but being a prostitute is not. Personally, I cannot understand how the biblical prohibition against anyone engaging in the buying and/or selling of people doesn't also prohibit the act of doing so? If it was fine to engage in the practice of slavery, then how could someone who did it be found guilty of breaking the law by doing that which is not prohibited?? ![[Linked Image]](http://www.the-highway.com/Smileys/Dunno.gif)
Can you explain your reasoning a bit more for me and possibly for anyone else who might be confused over this?
In His Grace,
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
138
guests, and
11
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|