Forum Search
Member Spotlight
Pilgrim
Pilgrim
NH, USA
Posts: 15,025
Joined: April 2001
Forum Statistics
Forums31
Topics8,348
Posts56,543
Members992
Most Online2,383
Jan 12th, 2026
Top Posters
Pilgrim 15,025
Tom 4,892
chestnutmare 3,463
J_Edwards 2,615
John_C 1,904
Wes 1,856
RJ_ 1,583
MarieP 1,579
Robin 1,079
Top Posters(30 Days)
Pilgrim 35
Tom 3
Robin 1
Recent Posts
King of Kings
by Tom - Thu May 21, 2026 4:31 PM
"If so be ye have tasted that the Lord is gracious."
by Pilgrim - Thu May 21, 2026 5:30 AM
"Marvellous lovingkindness."
by Pilgrim - Wed May 20, 2026 9:09 AM
"So to walk even as He walked."
by Pilgrim - Sun May 17, 2026 6:42 AM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
#34467 Tue Nov 21, 2006 6:05 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 7
Ivo Offline OP
Plebeian
OP Offline
Plebeian
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 7
I am having a lot of discussion with my Christian friends on reformed theology. This is a huge subject!

How important is an adamant view on say predestination? The article of the month by A A Hodge http://www.the-highway.com/articleAug02.html, in section VI suggests, according to my reading, that it is useful to have tension between two opposing views (Calvinism and Arminianism):

Quote
The difference between the best of either class is one of emphasis rather than of essential principle. Each is time complement of the other. Each is necessary to restrain, correct, and supply the one-sided strain of the other. They together give origin to the blended strain from which issues the perfect music which utters the perfect truth.


Note the quote itself should be read as I have cut out important parts where Hodge says that abstract historical arminianism is heresy.

What views do others have on this?

Ivo #34468 Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:15 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 710
Addict
Offline
Addict
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 710
Quote
Ivo said:
I am having a lot of discussion with my Christian friends on reformed theology. This is a huge subject!
. . . . .
How important is an adamant view on say predestination? What views do others have on this?

Reformed theology <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/Ponder.gif" alt="" />
Me personally I would just hammer on the five points of the doctrines of grace <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/bash.gif" alt="" /> if all they want to do is debate. Yes I know you said discussion and not debate.

Total depravity
Unconditional election
Limited atonement
Irresistible grace
Perseverance of the saints

While Calvinism is more than “the Five Points" they are great truths of the Word of God and it takes the grace of God to confess and to submit to the sovereignty of God. = PREDESTINATION

Williams <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/my2cents.gif" alt="" />

Last edited by William; Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:11 PM.
Ivo #34469 Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:23 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,856
Wes Offline
Needs to get a Life
Offline
Needs to get a Life
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,856
Quote
Ivo said:

I am having a lot of discussion with my Christian friends on reformed theology. This is a huge subject!

How important is an adamant view on say predestination?

It's essential because God is not dependent on his creatures in any sense. The Apostle Paul writes, 'So then it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy' (Romans 9:16). If salvation was dependent on man's decision making or good deeds he would be lost in his sin.

Salvation in general and election in particular are due to something in God, not in us. The Bible tells us that Jesus Christ died for us because 'God so loved...' (Jn.3:16). In other words, there was something in God--an inherent compassion, mercy, and love, which moved him to save us while there was absolutely nothing in us that attracted him.


Quote
Ivo said:

The article of the month by A A Hodge http://www.the-highway.com/articleAug02.html, in section VI suggests, according to my reading, that it is useful to have tension between two opposing views (Calvinism and Arminianism):

Quote
The difference between the best of either class is one of emphasis rather than of essential principle. Each is time complement of the other. Each is necessary to restrain, correct, and supply the one-sided strain of the other. They together give origin to the blended strain from which issues the perfect music which utters the perfect truth.


Note the quote itself should be read as I have cut out important parts where Hodge says that abstract historical arminianism is heresy.

What views do others have on this?

Isn't Hodge referring to the need for both the emphasis on human responsibility and the essential principal that God is sovereign? How could he be referring to the need for a blended strain of Arminianism and Calvinism when he's already stated that one is truth and the other is heresy?


Wes


When I survey the wondrous cross on which the Prince of Glory died, my richest gain I count but loss and pour contempt on all my pride. - Isaac Watts
Wes #34470 Thu Nov 23, 2006 3:59 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 7
Ivo Offline OP
Plebeian
OP Offline
Plebeian
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 7
Thanks for that Wes. Regarding Hodge, I think what you have said makes sense. I guess its a bit like faith and works. Faith should lead to works, but works without faith are dead. The fact that God has planned every detail from start to finish doesn't diminish our responsibilities to play our part in that plan. But even that of course needs to be part of Gods grace working in us.

Seeking the truth and opposing error are always important. God seeks worshippers who worship Him in spirit and truth.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 178 guests, and 41 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Bosco, Mike, Puritan Steve, NSH123, Church44
992 Registered Users
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
May
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Popular Topics(Views)
1,878,101 Gospel truth