Forum Search
Member Spotlight
Anthony C.
Anthony C.
NJ/PA
Posts: 706
Joined: May 2016
Forum Statistics
Forums31
Topics8,348
Posts56,544
Members992
Most Online2,383
Jan 12th, 2026
Top Posters
Pilgrim 15,025
Tom 4,892
chestnutmare 3,463
J_Edwards 2,615
John_C 1,904
Wes 1,856
RJ_ 1,583
MarieP 1,579
Robin 1,079
Top Posters(30 Days)
Pilgrim 35
Tom 4
Robin 1
Recent Posts
King of Kings
by Tom - Thu May 21, 2026 4:31 PM
"If so be ye have tasted that the Lord is gracious."
by Pilgrim - Thu May 21, 2026 5:30 AM
"Marvellous lovingkindness."
by Pilgrim - Wed May 20, 2026 9:09 AM
"So to walk even as He walked."
by Pilgrim - Sun May 17, 2026 6:42 AM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
#45123 Fri Sep 17, 2010 12:43 AM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 18
Plebeian
OP Offline
Plebeian
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 18
Hebrews 6:4-6
4) For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit, 5) and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6) if they fall away, to renew them again to repentance, since they crucify again for themselves the Son of God, and put Him to an open shame. NKJV

Can someone explain this to me? What does it mean to fall away? Must the five conditions be met in order to be disqualified? Where is the line between this and a "prodigal" Christian who does a "re-dedication"? Or is someone who does this merely a person who never was a Christian but has only then been opened to Jesus?

allthisstuff #45125 Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:39 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025
Likes: 274
Head Honcho
Offline
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025
Likes: 274
This is one of those passages where opinions vary greatly. What I can offer you is what I have come to understand from this passage which is a view held by many (most?) Reformed conservative exegetes.

1. To "fall away" is basically to repudiate one's profession of faith and/or the essential doctrines of Scripture.

2. Must all five conditions be met? No as they are not "conditions" but rather evidences expressed by one's life.

3. The "Prodigal" wasn't saved to begin with. He eventually, by God's grace, came to repentance and returned as a 'new man' (in Christ). Secondly, there is no biblical teaching to be found as to "re-dedication". This is akin to the modern heresy of "The Carnal Christian Theory" which is mentioned in this excellent article here: Decisional Regeneration.

4. Now, as to what the passage does teach... I believe, along with myriad others, that the writer is addressing a group of people who have not been regenerated, i.e., they possess a false profession/conversion and outwardly appear to be Christians for a time. The parable of the Sower (cf. Matt 13:3ff) is a good illustration of this type of individual. This type of person is typically a member in good standing in an organized church; even a pastor/elder or deacon. But for whatever reason, they return to the world and forsake their original profession and the Church. Their rejection is firm and final. Perhaps the person who most exemplifies who this passage is referring to is Judas Iscariot.

Hope this helps shed some light on this difficult passage for you. grin


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 90 guests, and 33 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Bosco, Mike, Puritan Steve, NSH123, Church44
992 Registered Users
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
May
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Popular Topics(Views)
1,878,514 Gospel truth