Posts: 706
Joined: May 2016
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,348
Posts56,544
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
#57472
Sun Feb 20, 2022 5:57 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 142 Likes: 1
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 142 Likes: 1 |
Someone said, "The newest issue of Protestant Reformed Theological Journal has a positive review of A Rebuttal of Common Grace and the Well-Meant Offer by Sonny Hernandez." Is anyone familiar with this Journal? If so, have you read the afore mentioned article and what is your take on it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274 |
Someone said, "The newest issue of Protestant Reformed Theological Journal has a positive review of A Rebuttal of Common Grace and the Well-Meant Offer by Sonny Hernandez." Is anyone familiar with this Journal? If so, have you read the afore mentioned article and what is your take on it?  I am familiar with that journal but I haven't read the article. I am more than familiar with with those particular doctrines of the PRC. #1 I do think they go too far with their view on "Common Grace" but do agree with many aspects of it. #2 I am basically in full agreement with their criticism of the "Well-Meant Offer" as are other non-PRC scholars who haven't drank the "Free Offer of the Gospel" koolaid booklet written by John Murray and Ned Stonehouse. When it first was published I wrongly assumed that it would be sound given who the authors are/were. But after reading it I was shocked that it was so much in error and not based on solid biblical grounds.  Here's Dr. John Gerstner's critique of that booklet and the view it espouses: Against the Well-Meant Offer
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
90
guests, and
33
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|