Posts: 3,463
Joined: September 2003
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,348
Posts56,543
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
#59729
Sun Aug 17, 2025 5:08 PM
|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 706 Likes: 21
Old Hand
|
OP
Old Hand
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 706 Likes: 21 |
There’s a thread on the Book Nook about Pilgrim’s Progress and I was interested in this comment: Those who are burdened and labor under the guilt of sin are called to come AS THEY ARE and Christ promises to relieve them of their guilt and find rest. No one can make themselves worthy in order to go to Christ. It is sinners who Christ came for and calls and not the righteous. So, I’m wondering if there is a more thorough distinction that needs to be made here regarding “burdened and labor under the guilt of sin.” How is this wrought in the first place? How does one even come to a place of being burdened and laboring under the guilt of sin? That has to come from Word & Spirit, no? Is this the issue at hand with the Marrow Men? Or was there something else that I may be missing? More specifically from that thread, Sinclair Ferguson at the Banner of Truth Pastor's Conference held at Wheaton College in 1978 made mention of John Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress when dealing with the theological and practical issues of another book. That book was The Marrow of Modern Divinity by Edward Fisher. The uproar that arose at its publication was in regard to the examination of prospective ministers and was (paraphrased) "is it necessary for a man to repent of his sins before he is able [warranted] to go to the cross and believe upon Christ unto justification/salvation?" Sinclair said that if one agreed with this statement, then justification is not all of grace but of works and in essence a denial of biblical Calvinism. He said that Bunyan erred on this issue in his book. For Christian was in need to remove his "burden" before he went to the cross. So is Ferguson wrong? Or is it Fisher who is wrong? Or both? Wikipedia, summarizes the Marrow Controversy thus… The Marrow Brethren, though rejecting universal atonement, held to common grace and that in some way God desires the salvation of all.[8] They attacked "High Calvinism", and sought to clear the gospel out of any other conditions other than faith. The Marrow Brethren denied that actions such as repentance, with either inward or outward reformation, are necessary to receive salvation, but saw them as naturally flowing from receiving Christ.[9][10] The Marrow Brethren taught a form of the republication of the covenant of works.[11] while maintaining the Mosaic Covenant was an administration of the Covenant of Grace. The Marrow had a high emphasis on the possibility of assurance,[12] seeing the work of Christ as the foundation of the believer's assurance, while the general Assembly emphasized the human element in having assurance.[13] The Marrow Men maintained a belief in the Scottish covenants even renewing them after the Secession.
Last edited by Anthony C.; Sun Aug 17, 2025 5:23 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274 |
1. I was in attendance of that Banner of Truth Pastor's Conference in 1978 and heard Sinclair Fergusen's three lectures.  2. Fergusen is correct and Bunyan erred. And the Aucterarder decision was worded poorly but in essence REQUIRED that a man repent before he had the WARRANT/RIGHT to come to Christ. 3. Conviction, repentance and faith are ALL of grace and work together at the time of regeneration. Those who have been regenerated WILL INFALLIBLY be convicted, repent and believe on Christ. The WCF is clear on the issue in a couple of places: The grace of faith, whereby the elect are enabled to believe to the saving of their souls, is the work of the Spirit of Christ in their hearts; and is ordinarily wrought by the ministry of the Word: by which also, and by the administration of the sacraments, and prayer, it is increased and strengthened.
By this faith, a Christian believeth to be true whatsoever is revealed in the Word, for the authority of god himself speaking therein; and acteth differently, upon that which each particular passage thereof containeth; yielding obedience to the commands, trembling at the threatenings, and embracing the promises of God for this life, and that which is to come. But the principle acts of saving faith are, accepting, receiving, and resting upon Christ alone for justification, sanctification, and eternal life, by virtue of the covenant of grace. ~ WCF 14:1, 2
Repentance unto life is an evangelical grace, the doctrine whereof is to be preached by every minister of the gospel, as well as that of faith in Christ.
By it a sinner, out of the sight and sense, not only of the danger, but also of the filthiness and odiousness of his sins, as contrary to the holy nature and righteous law of God, and upon the apprehension of his mercy in Christ to such as are penitent, so grieves for, and hates his sins, as to turn from them all unto God, purposing and endeavoring to walk with him in all the ways of his commandments.
Although repentance be not to be rested in as any satisfaction for sin, or any cause of the pardon thereof, which is the act of God's free grace in Christ; yet is it of such necessity to all sinners, that none may expect pardon without it. ~ WCF 15:1-3 Sinclair Fergusen's lecture can be listened to or downloaded here: SermonAudio.com - The Marrow Controversy #01: Historical DetailsSermonAudio.com - The Marrow Controversy #02: Danger of LegalismSermonAudio.com - The Marrow Controversy #03: Danger of Antinomianism
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
2 members like this:
Anthony C., Robin |
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
384
guests, and
48
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|