Quote
Is this the royal "We"? Don't drag others into your dishonest approach. <span style="background-color:#FFFF00">Nobody ever mentioned a web site or a problem with my web site. </span>If you had a problem with my web site, then you could have said so. However, you didn't. You veiled your approach in a thread about alleged Bible errors. Now, you mention a web site.

Really? Did I not ask you, “Since you have a Th.D. and the topic is now separated would you like to discuss what you maintain is the truth--<span style="background-color:#FFFF00">as there are errors at your website, et. al”?</span>

Besides your abrupt unjust outburst above you avoid the real issues. You desire to discuss alleged Bible errors without a proper theological foundation. We assert that you have an unbiblical foundation. In addition, we here believe in Sola Scriptura and thus you will find very few if any requests for your services though yes, we know you have “all” the answers.

What puzzles me is why you can’t answer a simple question—if indeed you have all the answers? Why won’t you discuss the atonement. You claimed a possible division—but you have managed that without discussing it. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/drop.gif" alt="" />

Please tone it down a bit. Perhaps you should read what your own site says concerning forgiveness or effective communication. I am sure you will hear from a administrator/moderator shortly—as the person you just unjustly characterized is a moderator.

Reformed and Always Reforming,