Quote
Wes said:
What’s wrong with Matthew Henry’s comments on the idea of carrying two swords?
I can't decide what it is Henry is saying! confused At times, it appears that he seems to indicate that the disciples were to carry BOTH a physical sword as protection AND to be armed with the "Sword of the Spirit", i.e., the Word of God. But he also appears to be saying that the disciples didn't need a physical sword. scratch1

The problem I have, as has already been stated elsewhere, is that the text does not allow the sword, which the Lord says the disciples should have, even if it means selling their outer garment to buy, to be spiritualized to mean the Scriptures. The literary form of that passage alone mitigates against doing this. grin

BTW... Matthew Henry is well-known as one who often spiritualizes the Bible in his Commentary. Thus one needs to read him with discernment! wink

In His Grace,


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]