|

|
|
|
Posts: 3,467
Joined: September 2003
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,378
Posts56,578
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295 May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,048 Likes: 286
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,048 Likes: 286 |
A quick answer, from my own personal perspective would be a physical denomination or church becomes apostate, i.e., cannot be considered as part of the visible Church when it denies and/or ignores the essential doctrines of the faith, e.g.,:
- Trinity - Deity of Christ - Deity and/or personality of the Holy Spirit - Inspiration, inerrancy and/or infallibility of Scripture - Creation by fiat; ex nihilo - Historic Adam and the Fall - The doctrines of sovereign grace (aka: Canons of the Synod of Dordt
As I said initially, this is my personal view and I'm sure many would balk at my criteria since it would exclude the majority of denominations/churches in existence today with my inclusion of the "Doctrines of Grace". My justification for adding this requirement is due to the fact, that anyone who held to semi-Pelagianism/Arminianism in years past was excommunicated; i.e., considered to be an unbeliever since holding to this type of heresy would constitute a doctrine which taught a synergistic salvation. Thus, if an individual was not considered a believer; part of the visible church it would logically follow that a denomination or church would be equally deserving of that judgment as well.
In His Grace,
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
792
guests, and
12
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|