|

|
|
|
Posts: 118
Joined: July 2025
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,379
Posts56,579
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295 May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,050 Likes: 286
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,050 Likes: 286 |
Wes said: In my church a term of (3) years is normal for someone ordained to the office of elder or deacon. It is generally understood that, "once and elder always an elder." However when one is not currently serving on the Council they are viewed as "inactive" versus an "active" elder. . . . This has been my experience also, that a typical term of active service is 3 years. But your reply activated my dormant "nit" in regard to how in many, if not most, churches, Deacons are deemed "inferior" to Elders. Since BOTH are ordained to office, would it not seem consistent and right that Deacons should also be deemed "once a Deacon always a Deacon"? The actually "calling" to serve in the Church of Christ is done by God the Holy Spirit Who dispenses the necessary gifts to those who are going to be office bearers and Who also causes such men to be recognized by their peers as having been specially gifted to serve. Is it therefore not only right that both Elders and Deacons be recognized and treated without prejudice in this regard? <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/scratchchin.gif" alt="" /> In His grace,
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
472
guests, and
7
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|