|
|
|
|
|
Posts: 118
Joined: July 2025
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,378
Posts56,578
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295
May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
#49839
Wed Jul 03, 2013 8:47 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,906 Likes: 1
Permanent Resident
|
OP
Permanent Resident
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,906 Likes: 1 |
I have heard many times when studying the book of James or a talk on Martin Luther, that Luther believed that the book of James should not be included in the Bible. Recently, and I have forgotten where, I came across an article asserting that though Luther did made that claim, he shortly thereafter recanted it.
Does anyone know the true story, and if turns out to be an incomplete statement in that Luther actually recanted, then why are we still telling and being told about Luther's accusation.
John Chaney
"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." Colossians 2:7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,048 Likes: 286
Head Honcho
|
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,048 Likes: 286 |
![[Linked Image]](http://www.the-highway.com/pilgrim/pil_sig2.gif) simul iustus et peccator![[Linked Image]](http://www.the-highway.com/Smileys/pencil.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
684
guests, and
14
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
