Forum Search
Member Spotlight
Posts: 3,342
Joined: September 2003
Forum Statistics
Forums30
Topics7,830
Posts55,059
Members976
Most Online732
Jan 15th, 2023
Top Posters
Pilgrim 14,498
Tom 4,585
chestnutmare 3,342
J_Edwards 2,615
John_C 1,871
Wes 1,856
RJ_ 1,583
MarieP 1,579
gotribe 1,060
Top Posters(30 Days)
Tom 14
John_C 1
Recent Posts
9-11 William Rodriguez's Story
by Anthony C. - Wed Sep 11, 2024 5:29 PM
Reporter Arrested Again….
by Tom - Thu Sep 05, 2024 10:58 PM
SBC to leave or not to leave?
by Tom - Thu Sep 05, 2024 11:56 AM
Secular Art
by Pilgrim - Mon Sep 02, 2024 9:28 PM
People’s Party of Canada
by Tom - Mon Sep 02, 2024 8:41 PM
Who Is 'This Jesus'? - Are You Ready To Give An Answer?
by chestnutmare - Mon Sep 02, 2024 8:40 AM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,498
Likes: 58
Head Honcho
Offline
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,498
Likes: 58
Susan,

Let me answer your question as to "what is considered 'casual dress' by relaying a short story which will also reveal my personal opinion on this issue. [Linked Image]

At a particular church, where I was a member at the time, the Lord's Supper was being administered one Sunday morning. I had invited a very good friend of mine to visit this church some weeks before. This friend was, and I still pray is, a very godly man who was "miraculously saved" out of the drug culture. Much of his free time was spent witnessing to men who frequented gospel missions, where I also preached regularly. (this should mean something to one here on the board who unfortunately had questions about where I brought the gospel to people!). He didn't own a suit, hadn't gotten around to cutting his hair, etc., but he sure loved God and knew his Bible better than many pastors. [Linked Image]

Anyway, my friend decided, unbeknown to me, to visit this church that Sunday morning. And, I happened to see him walk through the door looking like a lost puppy. [Linked Image] So, I got up and escorted him to where I was sitting. As I explained in how the Lord's Supper was administered in my previous post, the pastor made several "calls" for people to come to the Table up front. At the last call, when it appeared that there were very few willing to come (it was considered more "pious" to not go by some), the pastor then said, "Are there no more black-hearted needy sheep who need the communion of Christ this morning?" At that, my friend got up and went forward and sat at the table wearing his "best" suspendered "farmer jeans" and plaid cotton shirt. There was a noticeable hush in the sanctuary as he walked forward and sat down.

After the service, two stately Elders approached me and physically pushed me against the wall being in a state of great unrest said to me, "How dare you bring that type of individual here and allow him to go to the Lord's Table?" I explained that the this man was a very godly and righteous man and was just obeying the call to go forward to the Table and communion with Christ. They mentioned the fact that he was dressed in that outfit which they thought was inappropriate for such a solemn occasion. Now this really bothered me and I replied to these "Elders" that to the contrary, he was dressed in the ONLY PROPER ATTIRE! He was clothed with the righteousness of Christ. [Linked Image]

Okay.... so does this mean that I believe that "dress" is unimportant? Not at all. But I do believe that when we attend the house of God, we should consider just Who it is we are going to "meet" and for what purpose. Thus, one should dress accordingly, which may mean for some that they put on the "best" pair of jeans they own, if that is all they have. As a man thinketh, so is he. The Lord looks upon the heart, but our heart will dictate our outward appearance as well. Let each man, as God has blessed him, approach the LORD God with all humility, soberness and dressed for the occasion. For when we enter His house, we are coming before the KING of Glory.


In His Grace,


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 89
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 89
What a wonderful 'come back' - and no doubt you two never 'went back'?<br><br>Amen! <br><br>

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,498
Likes: 58
Head Honcho
Offline
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,498
Likes: 58
In reply to:

and no doubt you two never 'went back'?


Laz,

My friend didn't care to return but not because of anything said to him; which was basically nothing, not even a "Good Morning!" from any of the elders or the pastor. [Linked Image] But, he chose not to return because he didn't want any further incidents to happen to me due to his presence. We discussed this a some length and even though I tried to convince him that it was their problem, he couldn't bring himself to put any further burden upon me. What a guy! [Linked Image]

However, I didn't have much of a choice, or at least one that was amiable to me at the time. I was a student for the ministry in that denomination and that particular congregation was given the oversight of my training when at home. [Linked Image] I eventually left that denomination due to some serious disagreements. My only regret is that I didn't leave sooner! [Linked Image]


In His Grace,


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
Pilgrim,<br>Sounds like you went to The Church of the Frozen Chosen!<br>Susan<br>SWW<br><br>

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 49
Enthusiast
Offline
Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 49
I just read your response, and those to others, and am very glad you've dusted off your sandals. When I was younger it was dressed up or nothing for both my mother and I. She would go to such pains to make sure her bag matched her shoes and her hat didn't clash with either her dress, or in the winter, her coat..you get the idea. The conversations on the way home always touched on 'that person' who wore a summer hat with a winter coat, or white shoes after Labor day, never on the content of the sermon or Scripture and church was nothing more than a place to show off the new stuff, a social club, and when I got older I stopped going altogether. I guess I'm just alittle gun shy about a dress code for the masses. Hope I didn't ruffle any feathers.<br><br>the other Susan

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,498
Likes: 58
Head Honcho
Offline
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,498
Likes: 58
Susan,

Actually I do believe in a "dress code", although I only alluded to it in my other post. I believe that when we go to the house of God to come before Almighty God, we should dress accordingly. What does this mean? To me it means we are to dress ourselves with the best clothes we own, which have been given to us by His providence. We are not going to the beach, a party, a baseball game, a love in, etc. Thus we should not put on those items which are normally associated with those affairs. It does "irk" me to visit a church in the suburbs and see people dressed in t-shirts and sandals, women in shorts and halter tops, children in bathing suits and the pastor in jeans.

On the other side of things, such as that church I referred to, women were forbidden to wear slacks of any kind even in the dead of winter when it is freezing cold. [Linked Image] Pastor's wives are strictly forbidden to wear shorts at any time.

I do believe in "modesty of apparel", but that is a relative term and I don't believe there is a Scriptural warrant to put forth a definitive set of rules as to what is and what is not "modest". It seems to me that good old "common sense" would dictate against much that is in vogue these days. But, how about a little "respect" if nothing else, being afforded the "King"? Although it might not be prudent to say so, (I'll say it anyway [Linked Image] ) but it is true that one's views about God will surely dictate how one presents himself/herself for worship.


In His Grace,


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 49
Enthusiast
Offline
Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 49
I think I may be dragging this thread further and further off topic..but here goes. I agree with you on a certain level. I don't think you should come to church dressed for the activity that will immediately follow church. Witnessed some of that in my church shopping spree, not pretty. Boats were hooked up to cars out in the parking lot, it was like church was just another thing one had to do, like getting gas, before hitting the highway. To me, this is disrespectful, but it isn't 'to me' that people come to worship. Focusing on someone else's manner of dress detracts from us focusing on our own sinfulness and need for Christ. We're really all in the same lifeboat, and we should be exceedingly glad that we've got a seat, instead of worrying if everyone is dressed (or not dressed) for the occasion. Yes?<br><br>Humbly, the other Susan<br><br>

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,498
Likes: 58
Head Honcho
Offline
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,498
Likes: 58
Yep, getting too far afield here I think! [Linked Image]
In reply to:

. . .instead of worrying if everyone is dressed (or not dressed) for the occasion. Yes?


So, I'll just briefly make a comment on this statement of yours, and if you wish, go ahead and start a new thread on "dress codes, etc." [Linked Image]

I agree that one should not be preoccupied with other people's behaviour. But other than being inordinately preoccupied with "other people's dress" and the like", there is certainly a room for and a warrant to be concerned about another's spiritual welfare, no?

Prov 23:7 "For as he thinketh in his heart, so [is] he: Eat and drink, saith he to thee; but his heart [is] not with thee."
Surely, one's actions, whether it be the clothes worn, the truck with the boat attached in the church parking lot, or whatever are indicative of something of what that person thinks about God, worship, the Sabbath, et al. We live our theology Susan. [Linked Image] It may be right theology or wrong theology, but it's still indicative of what our heart dictates in the majority of cases.
Matt 24:28 "For wheresoever the carcase is, there will the eagles be gathered together."
The same is true with those who are fixated on what others are doing! [Linked Image] I don't believe God has simply opened wide the floodgates to allow anything that man thinks is to be reckoned as "okay" and therefore acceptable. The Harris' book, I'm Okay. You're Okay. isn't sound theology. [Linked Image]

If, in a typical church, people are attending formal worship "dressed down" (and you would find these same people attired in "finer" clothing at other less formal events, eg. a dinner party, etc.) I contend there is a problem:
    [*]The pastor has failed to preach the Word properly. Or,[*]The people are either spiritually immature or perhaps unconverted. Or,[*]A combination of both. Or,[*]Something else which isn't commendable.[/LIST]Remember, I'm not speaking of a group of shipwrecked individuals on some remote island who are gathering to worship. I'm speaking of your average church congregation here in the Americas. [Linked Image]


In His Grace,


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
#96 Fri Jun 17, 2005 8:12 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 216
Enthusiast
Offline
Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 216
...I love going back through the good ole posts that were here before I was. On this topic I want to ask if anyone thinks that it would be considered sacrilegious to have a Communion Sunday where the members of a church and other believers would enjoy an actual meal, communion and the preaching of the word in one setting? Is this done anywhere or would this be considered too informal?


tj
"-that I may know Him and the power of His resurrection..."
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,498
Likes: 58
Head Honcho
Offline
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,498
Likes: 58
Quote
thredj said:
On this topic I want to ask if anyone thinks that it would be considered sacrilegious to have a Communion Sunday where the members of a church and other believers would enjoy an actual meal, communion and the preaching of the word in one setting? Is this done anywhere or would this be considered too informal?
tj,

There can be no doubt that today in many churches, the Lord's Table is practiced in a less than formal manner, without even considering eating a full meal in conjunction with it. I have been in some churches, yes including those who belong to Reformed denominations, where the participants are dressed more for the beach than for worshipping the thrice holy God. There have been "rock" bands playing in some and the atmosphere was far from anything that could possibly considered reverent. (cf. Heb. 12:28; 29).

Too often when people read through 1Cor 11 in regard to the Lord's Supper, they begin at verse 23 and somehow either miss and/or ignore verses 20-22:


1 Corinthians 11:20-22 (ASV) When therefore ye assemble yourselves together, it is not possible to eat the Lord's supper: for in your eating each one taketh before [other] his own supper; and one is hungry, and another is drunken. What, have ye not houses to eat and to drink in? or despise ye the church of God, and put them to shame that have not? What shall I say to you? shall I praise you? In this I praise you not.


In this passage, Paul rebukes the Corinthian church for its misuse of the Lord's Supper by their having an actual meal at least relatively close to the administration of the Lord's Supper and asks them, rhetorically, why they are doing this when they have their own homes in which they can eat their regular meal. From this text, it appears to me that Paul is making a demarcation between the worship of the Lord and that which we do normally, aka: secular vs. sacred, a division which is not looked upon favorably today or even recognized.

Thus, from reading this passage, it seems to me that eating a regular meal as part of the Lord's Table or ancillary to it is unacceptable.

In His Grace,


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 216
Enthusiast
Offline
Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 216
Quote
Pilgrim says, or better yet, Scripture states: <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />
1 Corinthians 11:20-22 (ASV) When therefore ye assemble yourselves together, it is not possible to eat the Lord's supper: for in your eating each one taketh before [other] his own supper; and one is hungry, and another is drunken. What, have ye not houses to eat and to drink in? or despise ye the church of God, and put them to shame that have not? What shall I say to you? shall I praise you? In this I praise you not.

Pilgrim,
I can honestly say that I've never looked at this passage from that perspective before. The portion that you highlighted in your post pretty much settles the matter doesn't it? This had been something that I thought would be a "good idea" but as I come to realize more and more, sometimes our "good ideas" are not rooted in Scripture. Thanks brother.


tj
"-that I may know Him and the power of His resurrection..."
#99 Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:37 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4
Plebeian
Offline
Plebeian
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4
This comes from a congregation affiliated with the Conservative Baptist Association.

-- Frequency? (Once a week, once per month)?
First Sunday each month.

-- The kind of bread and wine used?
We use some kind of flat bread. I have an unbroken piece which I break as I explain about Christ's body being broken for us. grape juice.

-- Reading of 1Cor. 11 or some other text?
Yes.

-- Commentary or elaboration on the bread and wine?
Always. We also include a confession of sin and assurance of pardon during this service

-- Time of quiet reflection and/or prayer?

Yes.

Special attire?
-- White gloves?
-- Special robes?
-- Other?
None of the above, although I keep threatening to wear robes.

Finally, what, if any, of the above are viewed as the mandatory requirements of your communion observance?

A "fencing" of the table, by explaining that it for believers only. At the same time I explain that it is not just for members of our own congregation, but all who believe in Jesus Christ as their only savior.

Curt Lovelace

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7
Plebeian
Offline
Plebeian
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7
Piano?

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,498
Likes: 58
Head Honcho
Offline
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,498
Likes: 58
Quote
The Doctor said:
Piano?
[Linked Image] Sorry, but I can't name that tune in just one note. Care to play a few more bars so I and probably the majority of others can figure out what song you are playing with that reply? <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]
#102 Tue Jun 21, 2005 10:10 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 26
Newbie
Offline
Newbie
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 26
I have included the PCA Book of Church Order "solution" on the Sacrament of Communion with my comments in CAPS for clarification on my particular interpretation and practice.

The Administration of the Lord's Supper

58-1. The Communion, or Supper of the Lord, is to be observed frequently; the stated times to be determined by the Session of each congregation, as it may judge most for edification.

FREQUENCY IS... FREQUENTLY DISCUSSED. MOST OBSERVE COMMUNION ON A MONTHLY BASIS. A FEW DO SO QUARTERLY BUT A GROWING SEGMENT OF THE PCA OBSERVES WEEKLY COMMUNION. I DON'T SEE THAT BECOME COMMON HOWEVER. SINCE THE THEOLOGY CONNECTS TO THE PASSOVER OF THE OLD TESTAMENT SOME WOULD ARGUE FOR ANNUAL. THE NEW TESTAMENT SEEMS TO ENCOURAGE A MORE FREQUENT OBSERVANCE HOWEVER. JUST HOW FREQUENT IS THE QUESTION. I OBSERVE IT MONTHLY SOAS NOT TO MAKE IT TRIVIAL IN THE MINDS OF THOSE TAKING IT YET FREQUENT IN THEIR PARTICIPATION. I HAVE ALSO SEEN A MONTHLY MORNING OBSERVANCE AND A QUARTERLY EVENING OBSERVANCE ADDED TO IT MAKING THE TOTAL 16 TIMES IN A YEAR RATHER THAN 12.

58-2. The ignorant and scandalous are not to be admitted to the Lord’s Supper.

THIS IS A BIG DEAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHURCHES. THE WARNING GIVEN TO THE CONGREGATION MUST BE CLEARLY ARTICULATED FOR THEIR OWN GOOD AND TO ENCOURAGE THEM TO MAKE THE PROPER PREPARATIONS FOR THE SACRAMENT.

58-3. It is proper that public notice should be given to the congregation, at least the Sabbath before the administration of this ordinance, and that, either then, or on some day of the week, the people be instructed in its nature, and a due preparation for it, that all may come in a suitable manner to this holy feast.

SAME COMMENTS AS ABOVE COULD BE SAID HERE.

58-4. On the day of the observance of the Lord’s Supper, when the sermon is ended, the minister shall show:

a. That this is an ordinance of Christ; by reading the words of institution, either from one of the Evangelists, or from 1 Corinthians 11, which, as to him may appear expedient, he may explain and apply;

b. That it is to be observed in remembrance of Christ, to show forth His death till He come; that it is of inestimable benefit, to strengthen His people against sin; to support them under troubles; to encourage and quicken them in duty; to inspire them with love and zeal; to increase their faith, and holy resolution; and to beget peace of conscience, and comfortable hopes of eternal life.

Since, by our Lord’s appointment, this Sacrament sets forth the Communion of Saints, the minister, at the discretion of the Session, before the observance begins, may either invite all those who profess the true religion, and are communicants in good standing in any evangelical church, to participate in the ordinance; or may invite those who have been approved by the Session, after having given indication of their desire to participate. It is proper also to give a special invitation to noncommunicants to remain during the service.



58-5. The table, on which the elements are placed, being decently covered, and furnished with bread and wine, and the communicants orderly and gravely sitting around it (or in their seats before it), the elders in a convenient place together, the minister should then set the elements apart by prayer and thanksgiving.

The bread and wine being thus set apart by prayer and thanksgiving, the minister is to take the bread, and break it, in the view of the people, saying:




l That the Lord Jesus Christ on the same night in which He was betrayed took bread; and when He had given thanks, He broke it, gave it to His disciples, as I, ministering in His name, give this bread to you, and said, “Take, eat; this is My body which is for you; do this in remembrance of Me”

Here the bread is to be distributed. After having given the bread, he shall take the cup, and say:

In the same manner, He also took the cup, and having given thanks as has been done in His name, He gave it to the disciples, saving, “This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is shed for many for the remission of sins. Drink from it, all of you.”

While the minister is repeating these words, let him give the cup.

58-6. Since believers are to act personally in all their covenanting with the Lord, it is proper that a part of the time occupied in the distribution of the elements should be spent by all in silent communion, thanksgiving, intercession and prayer.


58-7. The minister may, in a few words, put the communicants in mind:

Of the grace of God, in Jesus Christ, held forth in this sacrament; and of their obligation to be the Lord’s; and may exhort them to walk worthy of the vocation wherewith they are called; and, as they have professedly received Christ Jesus the Lord, that they be careful so to walk in him, and to maintain good works.
It may not be improper for the minister to give a word of exhortation also to those who have been only spectators, reminding them:

Of their duty, stating their sin and danger, by living in disobedience to Christ, in neglecting this holy ordinance; and calling upon them to be earnest in making preparation for attending upon it at the next time of its celebration.

Then the minister is to pray and give thanks to God,

For His rich mercy, and invaluable goodness, vouchsafed to them in that Sacred Communion; to implore pardon for the defects of the whole service; and to pray for the acceptance of their persons and performances; for the gracious assistance of the Holy Spirit to enable them, as they have received Christ Jesus the Lord, so to walk in Him; that they may hold fast that which they have received, that no man take their crown; that their conversation may be as becomes the Gospel; that they may bear about with them, continually, the dying of the Lord Jesus, that the life also of Jesus may be manifested in their mortal body; that their light may so shine before men, that others, seeing their good works, may glorify their Father who is in heaven.

An offering for the poor or other sacred purpose is appropriate in connection with this service, and may be made at such time as shall be ordered by the Session.
THIS IS OFTEN CALLED "THE DIACONAL OFFERING" AND IS USUALLY GIVEN SPECIFICALLY FOR BENEVOLENCE PURPOSES.
Now let a psalm or hymn be sung, and the congregation dismissed, with the following or some other Gospel benediction:


Now the God of peace, that brought again from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great Shepherd of the sheep, through the blood of the everlasting covenant, make you perfect in every good work to do His will, working in you that which is well pleasing in His sight, through Jesus Christ; to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.

58-8. As past custom has been found in many parts of the Presbyterian Church, our congregations are urged to have a service of spiritual preparation for the Lord’s Supper during the week previous to the celebration of the Sacrament.


I HOPE THIS HELPS.
BLESSINGS,
M CANNON

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 58 guests, and 33 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
AngelaWittman, Sparrow, Pie, PuritanFanboy, Sikko Krol
976 Registered Users
ShoutChat
Comment Guidelines: Do post respectful and insightful comments. Don't flame, hate, spam.
September
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Popular Topics(Views)
1,545,691 Gospel truth