|

|
|
|
Posts: 117
Joined: July 2025
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,348
Posts56,544
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
#15124
Thu Jun 10, 2004 12:54 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,026 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,026 Likes: 274 |
Bill_Ross said: I seem to remember hearing nasty things about the NIV, but I can't remember what the problems were. Comments on that? For a recent discussion re: NIV, etc., see here: Literal vs. Dynamic. Some other threads on this topic: NIV BibleBible VersionsA website to consult on versions: http://faith.propadeutic.com/questions.htmlI personally prefer the "ASV" (1901 Edition) to them all for study and the KJV for devotional and daily reading. Other versions that I would put my own stamp or approval on are the NKJV and NASB. As to the RSV, it has some definite non-conservative biases behind its translation and thus fails to make my list. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" /> Reformation Monk mentioned the "Reformation Study Bible", which I concur is one of the very best in the Study Bible category. But as you will see from the thread linked above, I am adamantly opposed to the NIV version. And on a little side note, we are giving away a deluxe leather-bound copy of the "Reformation Study Bible" (NKJV edition) to the 25th person to donate to The Highway with a gift of $20 or more. See here: Support The Highway Special Offer. In His Grace,
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
1 members (Pilgrim),
127
guests, and
38
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|