The Highway Forums General Discussion Theology Discussion Forum Why do so many use the NIV?

I am certainly not going to guess as to why certain authors prefer the NIV (Dynamic Equivalence) versus one of the more traditional translations (Formal Equivalence). As you might realize, this subject has been thrashed myriad times on this Board and elsewhere.

I personal own a copy of the NIV but I never use it. I bought a copy for the purpose of studying it to see what all the rage was about some 25 years ago. My conclusion was that it is NOT a reliable "translation" and that it is a blight upon the Church. Let me relate, briefly, that when I was at WTS, my NT Greek professor was part of the translation committee of the NIV. One day I gathered the nerve to approach this esteemed scholar and asked the following question: "Would you agree that to the extent that someone accepts the Dynamic Equivalence theory of translation, that person to the same degree denies verbal plenary inspiration?" To my surprise, the answer I received was a reluctant, "Yes!". I admit, I didn't want to press my "luck" and press the issue, e.g., asking him why he was then part of the production of the NIV. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/giggle.gif" alt="" />

There can be found myriad articles and books defending both the "Dynamic Equivalence" and those which argue against it. But here is one which is rather good in arguing against it, Against the Theory of 'Dynamic Equivalence', by Michael Marlowe.

It seems that those who are pro-NIV and argue that it is "easier to read" apparently have forgotten or perhaps chose to ignore the fact that the Bible is a divinely inspired book which is only "open" to those who have been given eyes to see, a mind to comprehend and a heart receptive to the Word of God. It is by the work of the Spirit of God that anyone is able to understand the Scriptures in a way that effects a certain and core change of one's being, and not the simplicity of the grammar and/or vocabulary in which it is written. Secondly, it is the responsibility of the Church to expound and teach the Scriptures so that they are understood. (cf. Neh 8:5-8; Eph 4:11, 12) In short, the "difficulty" experienced by most is not that the language, grammar and/or style of the translation is archaic, stilted or too literal but rather the "difficulty" is a heart problem. <img src="/forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />

In His grace,