Tom,

Quote
From the NYT article:
But given the museum’s unwavering insistence on belief in the literal truth of biblical accounts, it is strange that so much energy is put into demonstrating their scientific coherence with discussions of erosion or interstellar space. Are such justifications required to convince the skeptical or reassure the believer?

Christians (evan-jelly-cals) who refuse to believe that the Genesis account of our creation is true from the Scripture Alone, or must have some sort of external proof, are already on the road to heresy and rank unbelief.

Unfortunately, IMO, the author of this article is telling the truth regardless of his philosophical bent.

Christians all along should have been petitioning the courts that the theory of Evolution is pseudo-science and bare naked religious speculation rather than trying to meet the atheist fools on their own ground. Speculating about origins is always philosophical as there is not just two possibilities for our creation but an infinite number. Just ask any Hindu, Carl Sagan/Steven Hawkings disciple, UFO believer, pagan or Mormon.

Denny

Romans 3:22-24

Denny

Simon Peter answered Him, "Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life." [John 6:68]