Matthew,

Thanks for taking the time to respond and confirm my suspicions re: terms used. Although I cannot find biblical support for Amyraldianism due to the inherent nature of Christ's atonement; i.e., it actually accomplished that which was purposed, according to the eternal predestination of God, I do understand why some hold to that position.

And, just in case you haven't read Jim Elliot's article on this subject, you can find it here: Sufficient for All.

Now.. I'll retreat from my off-topic question and gladly go [Linked Image]


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]