Originally Posted by Leah Ireland
From what little I have learned to date, my understanding of historic Amil is that is is completely different from Preterism, so I'm not quite understanding the article which reads that most Amils are Preterists. This is confusing to me.
yep Most Amils, such as myself, are not Preterists, i.e., we do not believe that the majority of what is found in the book of Revelation took place in 70 A.D. +/-. Many modern Post Millennialists, however, hold to "partial Preterism" sometimes referred to as Orthodox Preterism vs. Hyper Preterism.

Amillennialism is sometimes unfairly called "non-millennial" which is a misnomer. Even the name Amillennialism is unfortunately easily misunderstood. A more accurate name for the view is "Realized Millennialism" for the view believes that the millennium spoken of in Rev. 20 is now here. It began at the appearing of Christ and will last until His return at the end of the "age".


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]