|

|
|
|
Posts: 15,028
Joined: April 2001
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,352
Posts56,548
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295 May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,028 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,028 Likes: 274 |
Should we be allowing for the mor einclusive lannguage such as in Niv 2011, or stay with traditional, such as in Kjv/Nasb? I personally have no use for the NIV or any other translation that uses the Dynamic Equivalence method. But I'm not sure what you are referring to by "inclusive language"? 
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
View on the Inclusive language Bible debate?
|
JesusFan
|
Sat Feb 25, 2017 3:13 PM
|
Re: View on the Inclusive language Bible debate?
|
John_C
|
Sat Feb 25, 2017 4:15 PM
|
Re: View on the Inclusive language Bible debate?
|
JesusFan
|
Sat Feb 25, 2017 5:03 PM
|
Re: View on the Inclusive language Bible debate?
|
Pilgrim
|
Sat Feb 25, 2017 11:02 PM
|
Re: View on the Inclusive language Bible debate?
|
Meta4
|
Sun Feb 26, 2017 12:11 AM
|
Re: View on the Inclusive language Bible debate?
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Feb 26, 2017 12:19 AM
|
Re: View on the Inclusive language Bible debate?
|
Tom
|
Mon Feb 27, 2017 6:46 AM
|
Re: View on the Inclusive language Bible debate?
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon Feb 27, 2017 11:10 AM
|
Re: View on the Inclusive language Bible debate?
|
JesusFan
|
Tue Feb 28, 2017 7:00 PM
|
Re: View on the Inclusive language Bible debate?
|
JesusFan
|
Tue Feb 28, 2017 6:59 PM
|
Re: View on the Inclusive language Bible debate?
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue Feb 28, 2017 8:48 PM
|
Re: View on the Inclusive language Bible debate?
|
JesusFan
|
Wed Mar 01, 2017 4:10 PM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
58
guests, and
21
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|