|

|
|
|
Tom
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 4,893
Joined: April 2001
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,379
Posts56,579
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295 May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 351
Enthusiast
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 351 |
I also wanted to add another point, irrespective of what I posted above. When Matthias was appointed as an apostle, there was some very specific criteria he had to fulfill: Act 1:21-22, ESV. "So one of the men who have accompanied us during all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, beginning from the baptism of John until the day when he was taken up from us--one of these men must become with us a witness to his resurrection." Paul, the 13th apostle by the Lord's grace, saw the risen Jesus on the road to Damascus, and was later taken up into heaven, receiving direct revelation from the Lord (2. Cor. 12), thus fulfilling apostolic qualifications. Unless is can be undeniably proven that every Pope and bishop throughout history has fulfilled these qualifications themselves, a task completely absurd even in its stating, then the Roman Catholic church has some 'splaining to do.
(Latin phrase goes here.)
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Anonymous
|
Mon Oct 18, 2004 1:00 AM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Anonymous
|
Mon Oct 18, 2004 1:48 AM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Anonymous
|
Mon Oct 18, 2004 2:01 AM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Anonymous
|
Mon Oct 18, 2004 3:29 AM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Anonymous
|
Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:26 AM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Anonymous
|
Mon Oct 18, 2004 11:41 AM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Anonymous
|
Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:37 PM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Anonymous
|
Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:12 AM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
MarieP
|
Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:55 PM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Anonymous
|
Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:08 PM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Anonymous
|
Mon Oct 18, 2004 7:56 PM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
CovenantInBlood
|
Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:18 AM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Anonymous
|
Thu Oct 21, 2004 12:12 PM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
CovenantInBlood
|
Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:09 AM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Henry
|
Fri Oct 22, 2004 4:36 AM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Anonymous
|
Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:40 PM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Henry
|
Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:16 PM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Henry
|
Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:49 PM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Gileskirk
|
Tue Oct 19, 2004 12:30 AM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Henry
|
Tue Oct 19, 2004 1:58 AM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Gileskirk
|
Tue Oct 19, 2004 2:17 AM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Gileskirk
|
Tue Oct 19, 2004 2:27 AM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Henry
|
Tue Oct 19, 2004 2:37 AM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Anonymous
|
Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:47 AM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Gileskirk
|
Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:54 AM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Anonymous
|
Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:14 AM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Gileskirk
|
Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:33 AM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Henry
|
Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:51 AM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Anonymous
|
Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:36 PM
|
Re: Papal Infallibility..Catholic Definition
|
Anonymous
|
Fri Oct 22, 2004 4:08 PM
|
Popish Heresy
|
J_Edwards
|
Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:34 PM
|
What I don't understand is...
|
TheClingingVine
|
Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:25 PM
|
Re: What I don't understand is...
|
Anonymous
|
Mon Oct 18, 2004 10:50 PM
|
Ask and ye shall receive....
|
TheClingingVine
|
Mon Oct 18, 2004 11:33 PM
|
Re: Ask and ye shall receive....
|
Anonymous
|
Tue Oct 19, 2004 12:12 AM
|
No, you're safe.
|
TheClingingVine
|
Tue Oct 19, 2004 12:41 AM
|
Re: No, you're safe.
|
Anonymous
|
Tue Oct 19, 2004 1:15 AM
|
Yes, that's certainly what I always understood...
|
TheClingingVine
|
Tue Oct 19, 2004 2:06 AM
|
Re: No, you're safe.
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue Oct 19, 2004 2:36 AM
|
Re: No, you're safe.
|
Anonymous
|
Tue Oct 19, 2004 12:48 PM
|
Re: No, you're safe.
|
Henry
|
Tue Oct 19, 2004 2:08 PM
|
Re: No, you're safe.
|
Anonymous
|
Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:42 PM
|
Re: No, you're safe.
|
Henry
|
Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:09 PM
|
Re: No, you're safe.
|
Gileskirk
|
Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:03 AM
|
Re: No, you're safe.
|
Henry
|
Wed Oct 20, 2004 5:02 AM
|
Re: No, you're safe.
|
CovenantInBlood
|
Thu Oct 21, 2004 2:59 AM
|
Re: No, you're safe.
|
Anonymous
|
Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:53 AM
|
Re: No, you're safe.
|
CovenantInBlood
|
Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:05 AM
|
Re: What I don't understand is...
|
Anonymous
|
Tue Oct 19, 2004 2:49 PM
|
Still Waiting.........
|
J_Edwards
|
Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:07 PM
|
Re: Still Waiting.........
|
Gileskirk
|
Thu Oct 21, 2004 2:32 AM
|
Re: Still Waiting.........
|
Anonymous
|
Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:08 AM
|
Yet Another Delay Tactic....
|
J_Edwards
|
Fri Oct 22, 2004 2:16 AM
|
Re: Yet Another Delay Tactic....
|
neicey
|
Fri Oct 22, 2004 4:16 PM
|
Re: Yet Another Delay Tactic....
|
J_Edwards
|
Fri Oct 22, 2004 5:07 PM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
121
guests, and
14
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|