From the post that started the thread:

Quote
catholicsoldier said:
Papal infallibility is also rooted in precident. Even Protestants won't deny the Peter spoke infallibly in his address to the apostles (Acts 1:15) and his sermon following Pentecost (Acts 2:14-39). He then went on to write infallibly two epistles.

But are the Popes really the successors of Peter? Yes! The apostolic succession began with the appointment of Mathias in Acts, clearly indicating that the Apostolic age would go on and never die.
(James)

From Peter the Rock, the birth of the Papacy:

Quote
catholicsoldier said:
Apostolic succession began immediately with the appointment of Mathias by the rest of the apostles, and in the same manner bishops are appointed today.

It is in fact relevant to this thread. It was also relevant to the thread on Peter and the papacy. You have based both arguments on the fact that papal succession is reliant upon apostolic succession. Stop dodging.

Last edited by ForSBCReform; Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:50 PM.