|
|
|
|
|
Posts: 118
Joined: July 2025
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,380
Posts56,580
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295
May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
#22196
Wed Feb 16, 2005 6:21 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,906 Likes: 1
Permanent Resident
|
OP
Permanent Resident
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,906 Likes: 1 |
This morning radio Bible reading was in Leviticus 18 where the passage listed various no-no's in sexual relations. The list was very detailed but by today's Bible teaching it would have been incomplete. Why didn't the law just say something like all sex outside of marriage is forbidden? Except for the taboo on homosexuality, many pagans today would agree with the list. Again, I just wonder about the limited scope of the passage?
In addition, I saw where the NASB and NJK use uncover the nakedness whereas the reading was using NIV which uses sexual relations. I assume they basically have the same meaning.
John Chaney
"having been firmly rooted and now being built up in Him and established in your faith . . ." Colossians 2:7
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
431
guests, and
32
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
