Posts: 118
Joined: July 2025
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,378
Posts56,578
Members992
| |
Most Online4,295 May 22nd, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,049 Likes: 286
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,049 Likes: 286 |
1. To conclude that Newmax is an unreliable is foolish because you foolishly believe that Trump actually desires to annex Canada to the US. He would want Canada as a state due to its total commitment to Socialism to which he is 100% opposed and ran on the promise that Socialism will NOT take over the US as long as he is President. On this matter you aren't much different than those you are reporting as "off" on so many things. Perhaps you should take time for self-examination and think through what you just wrote re: Newsmax.  Even IF Trump truly wanted to have Canada join as part of the US and Newsmax reported such or even denied it, would that make them untrustworthy? You would totally damn that news agency over one single issue? How about Rebel News??? Do you use the same narrowminded criteria to judge whether that company is trustworthy? I seriously doubt that is the case. ![[Linked Image]](https://the-highway.com/Smileys/igiveup.gif) 2. Rejection of the WOKE DEI, does not in any shape or fashion negatively affect individuals with disabilities. Need I repeat what those who support the total eradication of DIE hold to be true??  Anyone who can qualify to do a particular job is a valid candidate for consideration of the position. IF, for example, a person with no legs applies for a job that doesn't require the use of one's legs to do the job, then there is no reason why he/she would not be considered for that position. But a blind person who applied for an airline pilot would not be considered, neither would a person without a college degree which is a requirement. So for the last time, the MERIT system is the criteria for any and all employment. If someone meets the necessary requirement, then that person is worthy of consideration. It ain't rocket science, Tom. It is fair in every aspect. On the contrary, DEI is 100% discriminatory; unfair and immorally based. Would I hire a person with all kinds of face piercings and purple hair and rarely bathed to work the counter of a retail store that caters to affluent clientele? NO, because that person would not meet the necessary dress code etc. for that business. That is NOT discriminatory! It would not meet the necessary qualifications needed to do the job.
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
140
guests, and
21
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|