|

|
|
|
Posts: 117
Joined: July 2025
|
|
|
|
Forums31
Topics8,348
Posts56,543
Members992
| |
Most Online2,383 Jan 12th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274
Head Honcho
|
Head Honcho
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 15,025 Likes: 274 |
John, I believe that Engelsma's exegesis of Matt 19:9 is flawed and thus his conclusion is of necessity flawed as well. For another viewpoint and exegesis of that passage by an able theologian of some note see here: Divorce & Remarriage, by John Murray. In His grace,
simul iustus et peccator
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
A question on remarriage
|
john
|
Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:45 PM
|
Re: A question on remarriage
|
Pilgrim
|
Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:31 AM
|
Re: A question on remarriage
|
john
|
Sun Oct 28, 2007 7:53 AM
|
Re: A question on remarriage
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon Oct 29, 2007 2:48 AM
|
Re: A question on remarriage
|
Clint
|
Tue Nov 06, 2007 11:12 PM
|
Re: A question on remarriage
|
brandon
|
Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:01 AM
|
Re: A question on remarriage
|
Clint
|
Mon Nov 12, 2007 5:50 AM
|
Re: A question on remarriage
|
Pilgrim
|
Mon Nov 12, 2007 2:39 PM
|
Re: A question on remarriage
|
brandon
|
Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:12 AM
|
Re: A question on remarriage
|
Pilgrim
|
Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:00 PM
|
Re: A question on remarriage
|
brandon
|
Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:08 PM
|
Re: A question on remarriage
|
brandon
|
Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:13 PM
|
Re: A question on remarriage
|
Matthew
|
Tue Nov 06, 2007 2:59 PM
|
Re: A question on remarriage
|
Matthew
|
Mon Oct 29, 2007 2:26 PM
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
219
guests, and
34
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|