Originally Posted by Anthony
I am sorry, a little leven spoils the whole lump, man needs to be a new creation.man in adam are useless, worthless, evil, not of God..

You dont really understand the full implication of Jesus saying a man must be born again..oher than that we are merely flesh, thats not the Image of God, sorry..
Where you have gotten this erroneous idea that the image of God is to be restricted ONLY to man's moral attributes only you know. But I can tell you that it is not biblical nor is a doctrine embraced by Christendom. I tried to explain to you that the "imago dei" is multi-faceted and that if you totally remove the "image of God" from man, he ceases to be man. Part of the "image" was that man was a rational being which distinguished him from all the other creatures that God created. So, again, remove the whole image and you are left with man being nothing more than a brute beast, e.g., a cow. Think about it. Have you really done ANY reading on this subject other than your spurious source which you have avoided revealing?

Re: me not understanding the full implications of ... being born again. Now you are being really silly. Your arrogance is only exceeded by your ignorance. scold I can assure you that I am more than knowledgeable about regeneration, aka: born anew, born again, born from above, spiritual resurrection, made alive, etc. Perhaps you need to do some more reading on this subject? Start here: Regeneration or the New Birth, by A.W. Pink.


[Linked Image]

simul iustus et peccator

[Linked Image]